Cambridge Conservation

TRAFFIC is a founder partner of:

Interested in a Masters in Conservation Leadership at the University of Cambridge? More details...


TRAFFIC is a member of:

Useful links


Shark populations dwindle as top catchers delay on conservation actions

in Japanese

After ten years, International Plan to save sharks still not implemented

Shark processing factory, Kesennuma, Japan: Of the top 20 shark catchers, Japan is the only one known to have reviewed and revised its national plan of action on shark conservation measures Click image to enlarge © Shawn Heinrichs Washington, D.C., USA, 27th January 2011—A decade after members of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO) approved an international plan to conserve sharks, a new analysis finds that it has yet to be fully implemented.

With 30 percent of all shark species now threatened or near threatened with extinction, there is little evidence that the plan has contributed significantly to improved conservation and management of these animals.  
The analysis, The Future of Sharks: A Review of Action and Inaction (PDF, 1.1 MB), uses fisheries information provided to the UN FAO to identify the top 20 shark-catching countries and other entities, and then assesses whether they have taken the management and conservation measures they agreed to in 2001.

According to the review, only 13 of the top 20 have developed national plans of action to protect sharks—one of the primary recommendations from 2001—and it remains unclear how those plans have been implemented or if they have been effective.  
The top 20 shark catchers account for more than 640,000 tonnes annually, nearly 80 percent of total shark catch reported globally. The top 10, in order, are: Indonesia, India, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, Pakistan, United States, Japan, and Malaysia.

Indonesia, India, Spain and Taiwan account for more than 35 percent of all sharks taken annually, based on their own reported data.  
Worldwide, shark populations are in decline due to unregulated fishing, much of it to meet the high demand for fins. Up to 73 million sharks are killed annually primarily for their fins, which are used as an ingredient in shark fin soup, a popular dish in many East Asian countries.
The analysis, produced by TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, and the Pew Environment Group, was released ahead of a crucial meeting of the UN FAO’s Committee on Fisheries (COFI), taking place between 31st January and 4th February in Rome, Italy. The two organizations recommend that COFI perform “a comprehensive review into the actions being undertaken to manage fisheries in which sharks are taken.”
“The fate of the world’s sharks is in the hands of the top 20 shark catchers, most of whom have failed to demonstrate what, if anything, they are doing to save these imperiled species.

"They need to take action to stop the decline in shark populations and help ensure that the list of species threatened by overfishing does not continue to grow,” said Glenn Sant, TRAFFIC’s Global Marine Programme Leader.
“Sharks play a critical role in the ocean environment. Where shark populations are healthy, marine life thrives; but where they have been overfished, ecosystems fall out of balance. Shark-catching countries and entities must stand by their commitments and act now to conserve and protect these animals,” said Jill Hepp, Global Shark Conservation manager for the Pew Environment Group.
For further information:
Richard Thomas, Global Communications Co-ordinator, TRAFFIC, +44 1223 279068 work +44 (0)752 6646216 mobile.

About Pew
The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a non-governmental organization that applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improve public policy, inform the public and stimulate civic life.

TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a threat to the conservation of nature. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of IUCN and WWF. For more information, visit

 The Future of Sharks: A Review of Action and Inaction (PDF, 1.1 MB)

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

« Log on to keep the tiger roaring | Main | How to tell real from fake ivory »